{"id":8580,"date":"2024-12-10T16:09:59","date_gmt":"2024-12-10T16:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/?p=8580"},"modified":"2024-12-10T20:46:31","modified_gmt":"2024-12-10T20:46:31","slug":"sentencas-publicas-do-cam-ccbc-procedimento-arbitral-no-78-2016-sec7","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/sentencas-publicas-do-cam-ccbc-procedimento-arbitral-no-78-2016-sec7\/","title":{"rendered":"Senten\u00e7as P\u00fablicas do CAM-CCBC: Procedimento Arbitral n\u00ba 78\/2016\/SEC7"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling\" style=\"--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last\" style=\"--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-margin-bottom:0px;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-1\"><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Esta an\u00e1lise marca o in\u00edcio da s\u00e9rie de informativos sobre as Senten\u00e7as Arbitrais P\u00fablicas do CAM-CCBC. O primeiro caso \u2013 <\/span><b>Procedimento Arbitral n\u00ba 78\/2016\/SEC7<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2013 trata da explora\u00e7\u00e3o de terminais portu\u00e1rios no Porto de Santos. As partes envolvidas s\u00e3o Libra Terminais S.A. e Libra Terminais Santos S.A., ambas em recupera\u00e7\u00e3o judicial, contra a Companhia Docas do Estado de S\u00e3o Paulo (CODESP) e a Uni\u00e3o Federal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">O tribunal arbitral \u00e9 composto por Lauro da Gama e Souza Jr., Cristiano de Sousa Zanetti e Rodrigo Garcia da Fonseca (Presidente). A quest\u00e3o discutida envolve o equil\u00edbrio econ\u00f4mico-financeiro do contrato de arrendamento portu\u00e1rio, c\u00e1lculos das parcelas devidas, ressarcimento das despesas com obras de melhoramento do cais, obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de dragagem e manuten\u00e7\u00e3o da profundidade adequada do cais, a superf\u00edcie da \u00e1rea arrendada, remanejamento do sistema rodoferrovi\u00e1rio e alega\u00e7\u00f5es de concorr\u00eancia desleal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">O resumo a seguir apresenta de maneira detalhada todas as quest\u00f5es controvertidas, bem como a decis\u00e3o do Tribunal Arbitral a respeito.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Partes Envolvidas<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Libra Terminais S.A. e Libra Terminais Santos S.A.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Companhia Docas do Estado de S\u00e3o Paulo (CODESP) e Uni\u00e3o Federal.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Tribunal Arbitral<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Co\u00e1rbitro: Lauro da Gama e Souza Jr.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Co\u00e1rbitro: Cristiano de Sousa Zanetti.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00c1rbitro Presidente: Rodrigo Garcia da Fonseca.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Principais Quest\u00f5es Discutidas<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1. Equil\u00edbrio Econ\u00f4mico-Financeiro do Contrato<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Alegaram que o contrato precisava ser reequilibrado devido a altera\u00e7\u00f5es nas condi\u00e7\u00f5es econ\u00f4micas e financeiras ao longo do tempo.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Defenderam que n\u00e3o havia necessidade de reequil\u00edbrio econ\u00f4mico-financeiro, argumentando que as condi\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais originais deveriam ser mantidas.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2. Obriga\u00e7\u00f5es de Manuten\u00e7\u00e3o<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Afirmaram que a CODESP n\u00e3o cumpriu suas obriga\u00e7\u00f5es de manuten\u00e7\u00e3o da infraestrutura portu\u00e1ria, incluindo a dragagem e a adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do cais.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Negaram a responsabilidade, argumentando que as obras de manuten\u00e7\u00e3o e adequa\u00e7\u00e3o eram de responsabilidade das requerentes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3. Penalidades e Ressarcimentos<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Buscaram ressarcimento pelas despesas com obras realizadas e penalidades por inadimplemento da CODESP.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Contestaram a necessidade de ressarcimento e penalidades, alegando que as obras realizadas pelas requerentes n\u00e3o eram de responsabilidade da CODESP.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4. Entrega de \u00c1rea a Menor<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Alegaram que a \u00e1rea arrendada era menor do que a prometida no contrato, causando preju\u00edzos operacionais.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Argumentaram que a \u00e1rea entregue estava de acordo com o contrato e que a diferen\u00e7a era aceit\u00e1vel dentro dos limites legais.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5. Remanejamento do Sistema Rodoferrovi\u00e1rio<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Afirmaram que a CODESP n\u00e3o realizou o remanejamento do sistema rodoferrovi\u00e1rio, conforme prometido, prejudicando as opera\u00e7\u00f5es do terminal.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Negaram a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de realizar o remanejamento, argumentando que essa responsabilidade era das requerentes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6. Concorr\u00eancia Desleal<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requerentes: Alegaram que a CODESP promoveu concorr\u00eancia desleal ao ceder \u00e1reas portu\u00e1rias para novos operadores sem licita\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requeridas: Defenderam que as concess\u00f5es foram feitas de acordo com a lei e que n\u00e3o houve concorr\u00eancia desleal.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Decis\u00f5es do Tribunal Arbitral<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.Equil\u00edbrio Econ\u00f4mico-Financeiro<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal rejeitou os pedidos de reequil\u00edbrio econ\u00f4mico-financeiro das requerentes, mantendo as condi\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais originais.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2. Obriga\u00e7\u00f5es de Manuten\u00e7\u00e3o<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal concluiu que a CODESP n\u00e3o tinha a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de realizar as obras de manuten\u00e7\u00e3o e adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do cais, sendo essa responsabilidade das requerentes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3. Penalidades e Ressarcimentos<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal determinou que as requerentes n\u00e3o tinham direito ao ressarcimento das despesas com obras realizadas, pois essas obras eram de sua responsabilidade.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4. Entrega de \u00c1rea a Menor<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal concluiu que a \u00e1rea entregue estava de acordo com o contrato e que a diferen\u00e7a era aceit\u00e1vel dentro dos limites legais.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5. Remanejamento do Sistema Rodoferrovi\u00e1rio<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal decidiu que a CODESP n\u00e3o tinha a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de realizar o remanejamento do sistema rodoferrovi\u00e1rio, sendo essa responsabilidade das requerentes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6. Concorr\u00eancia Desleal<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Decis\u00e3o: O tribunal rejeitou as alega\u00e7\u00f5es de concorr\u00eancia desleal, concluindo que as concess\u00f5es foram feitas de acordo com a lei.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Conclus\u00e3o<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">O tribunal arbitral decidiu majoritariamente em favor das Requeridas, mantendo as condi\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais originais e rejeitando os pedidos de reequil\u00edbrio econ\u00f4mico-financeiro, ressarcimento e penalidades das Requerentes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Por:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/nossa-equipe\/gustavo-henrique-torres-rocha\/\">Gustavo Henrique Torres Rocha<\/a> &#8211; Advogado<\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-separator fusion-full-width-sep\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;width:100%;\"><div class=\"fusion-separator-border sep-single sep-solid\" style=\"--awb-height:20px;--awb-amount:20px;border-color:#e0dede;border-top-width:1px;\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling fusion-equal-height-columns\" style=\"--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last\" style=\"--awb-bg-size:cover;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-builder-row-inner fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column_inner fusion-builder-nested-column-0 fusion_builder_column_inner_5_6 5_6 fusion-five-sixth fusion-column-first\" style=\"--awb-bg-size:cover;width:83.333333333333%;width:calc(83.333333333333% - ( ( 4% ) * 0.83333333333333 ) );margin-right: 4%;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-column-content-centered\"><div class=\"fusion-column-content\"><div class=\"fusion-title title fusion-title-1 fusion-sep-none fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-three\" style=\"--awb-margin-bottom:5px;\"><h3 class=\"title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated\" style=\"margin:0;--fontSize:18;--minFontSize:18;line-height:1.5;\"><h2><strong>Mais informa\u00e7\u00f5es<\/strong><\/h2><\/h3><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-2\"><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/areas-de-atuacao\/direito-empresarial\/\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Empresarial, contratos e arbitragem:<\/span><\/b><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/nossa-equipe\/daniel-tavela-luis\/\">Daniel Tavela Lu\u00eds<\/a> (<a href=\"mailto:daniel@mluis.adv.br\">daniel@mluis.adv.br<\/a>)\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-3\"><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/areas-de-atuacao\/direito-tributario\/\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Tribut\u00e1rio e contencioso:<\/span><\/b><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/nossa-equipe\/victor-nobrega-luccas\/\">Victor N\u00f3brega Luccas<\/a> (<\/span><a href=\"mailto:victor@mluis.adv.br\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">victor@mluis.adv.br<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">)\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{\" data-wac-het=\"1\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-4\"><h3>Se preferir, v\u00e1 at\u00e9 a p\u00e1gina <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/contato\/\"><strong><em>contato<\/em><\/strong><\/a> e fale conosco.<\/h3>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arbitragem"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8580"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8585,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8580\/revisions\/8585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mluis.adv.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}